Bible, Tradition, Canon, & “Sola Scriptura” (Index Page)

Bible, Tradition, Canon, & “Sola Scriptura” (Index Page) November 8, 2006
BibleRosary
Photograph by Chris Sloan, 28 Nov. 2009 [Flickr / CC BY 2.0 license]
*****

Table of Contents

* * *
I. Relationship of the Bible to the Church
*
II. Tradition (Apostolic)
*
III. Sola Scriptura (Scripture as the Only Infallible Authority)
*
IV. Perspicuity (Clearness) of Scripture
*
V. Material and Formal Sufficiency of Scripture / Rule of Faith
*
VI. The Canon of Scripture
*
VII. Deuterocanonical Books (So-Called “Apocrypha”)
*
VIII. Biblical Accuracy / Alleged Biblical Contradictions and Difficulties
 *
* * * * *
I. RELATIONSHIP OF THE BIBLE TO THE CHURCH
***

Why Do Christians Believe in Biblical Inspiration? (Archaeological, Prophetic, and Manuscript Evidences) [1987]

An Introduction to Bible Interpretation [1987]

Apologetics-Oriented Biblical Commentary on Philippians (RSV) [1998]

Apologetics-Oriented Biblical Commentary on Colossians (RSV) [1998]

Laymen’s Greek & Hebrew Bible Resources for Free [1-22-02; linked sources added on 11-28-16]

“Why Don’t Catholics Read the Bible?” [6-26-02]

Catholic “Three-Legged Stool”: Scripture, Tradition, & Church: Dialogue with an Anglican on the Catholic Rule of Faith (vs. Jon Jacobson) [10-31-02]

The Freedom of the Catholic Biblical Exegete / Interpreter + Bible Passages that the Church has Definitively Interpreted [9-14-03]

“Biblical Evidence” from the Catholic Point of View [2-1-08]

Bibles & Catholics, Sunday School?, Memorization, Etc. [9-25-08]

Books by Dave Armstrong: Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths: A Source Book for Apologists and Inquirers [4-18-09]

Why Folks Like the New Catholic Answer Bible (+ Clueless Anti-Catholic Attacks On It) [4-5-09; slightly revised on 8-5-21]

How Do Catholics Approach & Interpret Holy Scripture? [6-17-09]

Catholic Interpretation of Scripture (Hermeneutics / Exegesis): Resource List (Links) [6-28-09]

Were Vernacular Bibles Unknown Before Luther? (Luther’s Dubious Claims About the Supposed Utter Obscurity of the Bible Before His Translation) [6-15-11]

Reply to a Lutheran on Tradition & the Patristic Rule of Faith [1-10-12; additions on 2-20-18]

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Dialogue on Authoritative Bible Interpretation in the New Testament (vs. Reformed Baptist Elder Jim Drickamer) [1-14-17]
*
*
Church Fathers and Sola Scriptura [originally July 2003; somewhat modified condensation: 4-5-17]
*
Catholics R More Biblical Than Protestants? (Dialogue) (vs. Dustin Buck Lattimore) [5-3-17]
*
*
The Analogy of an Infallible Bible to an Infallible Church [11-6-05; rev. 7-25-15 and 6-7-17; published at National Catholic Register: 6-16-17]
*
*
*
*
Why Are Catholics So Deficient in Bible-Reading? [National Catholic Register, 11-22-17]
*
*
*
*
*
*
Catholic Biblical Interpretation: Myths and Truths [National Catholic Register, 12-3-18]
*
*
*
Martin Luther on the Exact Nature of Being “Biblical” [11-10-14; revised and expanded on 1-5-20]
*
Vatican II Upheld Biblical Inerrancy (vs. David Palm) [4-23-20]
*
*
*
*
*
*
No, Pope Innocent III Did Not Prohibit the Bible in 1199 [National Catholic Register, 8-2-21]
*
*
*
 
II. TRADITION (APOSTOLIC) 
 
***
*
*
*
*
Dialogue on “Perspicuous Apostolic Teaching” (vs. James White) [May-June 1996]
*
“Tradition” Isn’t a Dirty Word [late 90s; rev. 8-16-16]
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
 “Tradition” Is Not Always a Bad Word! [written specifically for children: 12 or younger; 2-12-14]
*
*
*
Church Fathers and Sola Scriptura [originally July 2003; somewhat modified condensation: 4-5-17]
*
Tradition is Not a Dirty Word — It’s a Great Gift [National Catholic Register, 4-24-17]
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Martin Luther on the Exact Nature of Being “Biblical” [11-10-14; revised and expanded on 1-5-20]
*
*
2 Thessalonians 2:15 & Tradition (vs. Steve Hays) [5-12-20]
*
*
*
*
*
The Bible Alone? That’s Not What the Bible Says [National Catholic Register, 3-5-21]
*
*
*
Extra-Biblical, Spirit-Led Prophecy After the Day of Pentecost [4-1-21; published at Catholic365, 11-7-23]
*
*
*
*
*
How Did the Gospel Writers Know About ‘Hidden’ Events? [National Catholic Register, 3-31-22]
*
Pharisees, “Moses’ Seat”, Tradition & Catholicism [Dec. 2003 and May 2005; a condensed, re-edited, and mildly revised version: 5-1-22]
*
*
*
*
The Authority of Apostolic Tradition: chapter one of my 2009 book, Bible Truths for Catholic Truths: A Source Book for Apologists and Inquirers [10-9-23]
*
*
*
*
 III. SOLA SCRIPTURA
***
*
*
*
*
*
*

Debate: Church Fathers & Sola Scriptura (vs. Jason Engwer) [8-1-03]

Ten Church Fathers & Sola Scriptura (vs. Jason Engwer) [8-1-03]

Sola Scriptura: Unbiblical!: Refutation of Dr. Richard Bennett [9-15-03]

Refutation of Dr. John MacArthur’s Sola Scriptura Defense: “The Sufficiency of the Written Word” [9-15-03]

Biblical Argumentation: Same as Sola Scriptura? [10-7-03]

Quick Ten-Step Refutation of Sola Scriptura [10-10-03]

55-Minute Interview on Catholic Answers Live: “Why we Need More than the Bible” (listen to audio file: see #8) (10-10-03)

“Moses’ Seat” & Jesus vs. Sola Scriptura (vs. James White) [12-27-03]

Sola Scriptura and Private Judgment Are Logically Circular [1-28-04; slight modifications and abridgment on 9-5-17]

Difficulties of Authority: Luther, Calvin, & Protestantism [4-11-04]

Sola Scriptura is Self-Defeating and False if Not in the Bible (vs. Kevin Johnson) [5-4-04]

Jerusalem Council vs. Sola Scriptura [9-2-04]

Analyzing Luther / Protestant Traditions of Men Inevitable [9-29-04]

Dialogue: Lutherans, Sola Scriptura, & the Church Fathers [5-29-05]

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Papal Infallibility Doctrine: History (Including Luther’s Dissent at the Leipzig Disputation in 1519) (Related also to the particular circumstances of the origins of sola Scriptura) [10-8-07]
*
Sola Scriptura Debate (vs. C. Michael Patton) [10-19-08]
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
10-Point Biblical Refutation of Sola Scriptura [National Catholic Register, 12-11-16]
*
Church Fathers and Sola Scriptura [originally July 2003; somewhat modified condensation: 4-5-17]
*
Catholics R More Biblical Than Protestants? (Dialogue) (vs. Dustin Buck Lattimore) [5-3-17]
*
*
*
3 Effective Biblical Refutations of Sola Scriptura [National Catholic Register, 11-12-17]
*
David T. King Ignores Sola Scriptura Biblical Disproofs (Incl. lengthy analysis of 2 Peter 1:20: “no prophecy of scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation”) [11-13-17]
*
*
The New Testament Canon is a “Late” Doctrine [National Catholic Register, 1-22-18]
*
*
* 
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Martin Luther on the Exact Nature of Being “Biblical” [11-10-14; revised and expanded on 1-5-20]
*
*
1 Timothy 3:15 = Church Infallibility (vs. Steve Hays) [5-14-20]
*
Does Sola Scriptura Create Chaos? (vs. Steve Hays) [5-15-20]
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Is Sola Scriptura Self-Refuting? (vs. Bruno Lima) [10-12-22]
*
*
*
*
IV. PERSPICUITY (CLEARNESS) OF SCRIPTURE
***

Baptismal Regeneration: Central Doctrine, According to Luther & Lutheranism [1996]

Dialogue: Clearness (Perspicuity) of Scripture and the Formal Sufficiency of Scripture (vs. Carmen Bryant) [6-8-00]

Dialogue: Church Fathers on Perspicuity & Sola Scriptura [6-11-00]

The Sufficiency & Perspicuity of Scripture & the Trinity [6-16-03; slightly revised on 1-20-04]

The Revised Fundamentalist Baptist Version (RFBV) [5-18-04]

Is the Bible in Fact Clear, or “Perspicuous” to Every Individual? [2007]

Luther: Scripture Easily Grasped by “Plowboys” [11-1-08]

Erasmus’ Hyperaspistes (1526): Sola Scriptura and Perspicuity of Scripture [2-12-09]

25 Brief Arguments Regarding Biblical “Clearness” [2009]

The Perspicuity (Clearness) of Scripture: A Summary [1-22-10]

The Anglican Newman (1833-1838) on the Falsity of Perspicuity (Clearness) of Holy Scripture [3-7-11]

Bible: Completely Self-Authenticating, So that Anyone Could Come up with the Complete Canon without Formal Church Proclamations? (vs. Wm. Whitaker) [July 2012]

Perspicuity (Clearness) of Scripture (vs. Wm. Whitaker) [July 2012]

The Bible: “Clear” & “Self-Interpreting”? [February 2014]

Perspicuity (Clarity) of Holy Scripture [11-21-15]

Protestant Unity on “Central” Doctrines?: Baptism as Test Case (vs. Methodist Philosophy professor Jerry Walls) [1-9-17]

Dialogue on Authoritative Bible Interpretation in the New Testament (vs. Reformed Baptist Elder Jim Drickamer) [1-14-17]

The Clearness, or “Perspicuity,” of Sacred Scripture [National Catholic Register, 11-16-17]

Biblical Interpretation & Clarity: Dialogue w an Atheist [5-26-18]

Is Inspiration Immediately Evident in Every Biblical Book? [National Catholic Register, 7-28-18]

Bible “Difficulties” Are No Disproof of Biblical Inspiration [National Catholic Register, 6-29-19]

“Difficulty” in Understanding the Bible: Hebrew Cultural Factors [2-5-21]

An Omniscient God and a “Clear” Bible [National Catholic Register, 2-28-21]

Did Pope Innocent III Forbid the Bible in 1199? (+ Does the Bible Itself Teach That it Should be Read Without Need of Any Authoritative Interpretation?) [5-11-21]

*

V. MATERIAL AND FORMAL SUFFICIENCY OF SCRIPTURE / RULE OF FAITH
***
*
*
The Sufficiency & Perspicuity of Scripture & the Trinity [6-16-03; slightly revised on 1-20-04]
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Church Fathers and Sola Scriptura [originally July 2003; somewhat modified condensation: 4-5-17]
*
*
*
Martin Luther on the Exact Nature of Being “Biblical” [11-10-14; revised and expanded on 1-5-20]
*
*
1 Timothy 3:15 = Church Infallibility (vs. Steve Hays) [5-14-20]
*
*
*
VI. THE CANON OF SCRIPTURE
***
*
*
*
Development of the Biblical Canon: Protestant Difficulties [2-26-02 and 3-19-02, abridged with slight revisions and additions on 7-19-18]
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
The New Testament Canon is a “Late” Doctrine [National Catholic Register, 1-22-18]
*
*
*
*
*
*
VII. DEUTEROCANONICAL BOOKS (SO-CALLED “APOCRYPHA”)
***
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
How to Defend the Deuterocanon (or ‘Apocrypha’) [National Catholic Register, 3-12-17]
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
VIII. BIBLICAL ACCURACY AND INSPIRATION / ALLEGED BIBLICAL CONTRADICTIONS AND DIFFICULTIES   
[see also related papers in the Atheist and Agnostic section]
 
FEATURED: Inspired!: 191 Supposed Biblical Contradictions Resolved (free online book) [6-3-23]
Master Lists and  Resources 
 
***
*
*
General 
***
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Refutation of 194 Biblical “Contradictions” (#26-50) [4-6-22] [links to the entire eight-part series included]
*
*
See also:
*
How Ancient Authors Wrote (Jimmy Akin, 3-19-22)
*
Jesus 
***
*
The Resurrection: Hoax or History? [cartoon tract with art by Dan Grajek: 1985]
*
*
*
*
*
Atheist “Refutes” Sermon on the Mount (Or Does He?) [National Catholic Register, 7-23-17]
*
*
*
What Does “Turn the Other Cheek” Mean? [National Catholic Register, 7-20-19]
*
*
*
The Signs Of His Coming (David Palm, 1993) [Master’s Thesis on whether Jesus thought the end times were coming during the lifetime of His hearers] 
*
Gerasenes, Gadarenes, Pigs and “Contradictions” [National Catholic Register, 1-29-21]
*
*
*
Miscellaneous
***
Dialogue with a Skeptic of Christianity (vs. Charlie Kluepfel) [5-2-99]
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Vatican II Upheld Biblical Inerrancy (vs. David Palm) [4-23-20]
*
Who Caused Job to Suffer — God or Satan? [National Catholic Register, 6-28-20]
*
God in Heaven & in His Temple: Contradiction? (vs. Dr. Steven DiMattei) [11-23-20]
*
*
Genesis, Adam and Eve, Noah, Abraham, Moses, & Other Early Figures
***
*
*
Historicity of Adam and Eve [9-23-11; rev. 1-6-22]
*
Defending the Historical Adam of Genesis (vs. Eric S. Giunta) [9-25-11]
*
*
*
“Did Adam and Eve Really Exist?” (Dr. Dennis Bonnette, Crisis Magazine, 11-24-14)
*
*
*
*
*
*
The Genesis Creation Accounts and Hebrew Time [National Catholic Register, 7-2-17]
*
New Testament Evidence for Noah’s Existence [National Catholic Register, 3-11-18]
*
*
*
*
Orthodox Interpretation of Genesis and the Serpent [National Catholic Register, 11-19-18]
*
*
*
Golden Calf & Cherubim: Biblical Contradiction? (vs. Dr. Steven DiMattei) [11-23-20]
*
A Bible Puzzle About the Staff of Moses and Aaron [National Catholic Register, 1-14-21]
*
*
*
*
Bible and Science
*

Scripture, Science, Genesis, & Evolutionary Theory: Mini-Dialogue with an Atheist [8-14-18; rev. 2-18-19]

The Bible and Mythical Animals[National Catholic Register, 10-9-19]

The Bible is Not “Anti-Scientific,” as Skeptics Claim[National Catholic Register, 10-23-19]

Herod Agrippa I “Eaten By Worms”: Myth or Plausible? [6-20-23]

*

Massacres and Wars of Annihilation / God’s Judgment
***
*
*
*
*
Last updated on 5 March 2024
*****
***
*
Practical Matters: Perhaps some of my 4,500+ free online articles (the most comprehensive “one-stop” Catholic apologetics site) or fifty-five books have helped you (by God’s grace) to decide to become Catholic or to return to the Church, or better understand some doctrines and why we believe them.
*
Or you may believe my work is worthy to support for the purpose of apologetics and evangelism in general. If so, please seriously consider a much-needed financial contribution. I’m always in need of more funds: especially monthly support. “The laborer is worthy of his wages” (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV). 1 December 2021 was my 20th anniversary as a full-time Catholic apologist, and February 2022 marked the 25th anniversary of my blog.
*
PayPal donations are the easiest: just send to my email address: apologistdave@gmail.com. You’ll see the term “Catholic Used Book Service”, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing, see my page: About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong / Donation InformationThanks a million from the bottom of my heart!*
*
***

Browse Our Archives