Rhetoric Race and Religion
Miami. Baton Rouge. Jacksonville. Columbia, South Carolina: These are not the places that immediately come to mind when considering America’s HIV epidemic. But in the ranking of US cities with the highest HIV rates, they are numbers one, two, three, and six, respectively.
On Thursday the New York Times ran an important story by Donald McNeil Jr. about the “new face” of HIV— young, poor black and Hispanic men who have sex with men. One thing not mentioned in the article—which focuses on New York City—is the geography of the epidemic, which is now concentrated and most deadly in the southern states. While only 37 percent of Americans live in the South, half of new HIV infections originate there. Eight of the ten states with the highest rate of infection are in the south, as are nine of the ten states with the highest AIDS fatalities rates.
McNeil focuses mostly on the scarcity of resources available to fund targeted messaging in black and Hispanic communities, and that’s certainly a problem. But the regional dynamics of HIV, and the fact that young men of color who have sex with men actually engage in less high-risk behavior than their white cohorts suggest that messaging isn’t the only thing needed. McNeil’s conclusion is that when it comes the spread of HIV among young men of color, “the prospects for change look grim” because “the national response is fragmented and hesitant.”
There are two policies on the table that could have a profound effect on the rate of new infections in the US, which has hovered near 50,000 new cases a year for a decade: the expansion of Medicaid, and comprehensive immigration reform. The implications of these policies for HIV are magnified by the fact that their impact would be particularly strong in the south.
Read the rest here
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In